Internet Engineering Task Force SIMPLE WG
Internet Draft J. Rosenberg
dynamicsoft
draft-ietf-simple-winfo-format-04.txt
January 31, 2003
Expires: July 2003
An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Based Format
for Watcher Information
STATUS OF THIS MEMO
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
To view the list Internet-Draft Shadow Directories, see
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Abstract
Watchers are defined as entities that request (i.e., subscribe to)
information about a resource. There is fairly complex state
associated with these subscriptions. The union of the state for all
subscriptions to a particular resource is called the watcher
information for that resource. This state is dynamic, changing as
subscribers come and go. As a result, it is possible, and indeed
useful, to subscribe to the watcher information for a particular
resource. In order to enable this, a format is needed to describe the
state of watchers on a resource. This specification describes an XML
document format for such state.
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 1]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ........................................ 3
2 Terminology ......................................... 3
3 Structure of Watcher Information .................... 3
4 Computing Watcher Lists from the Document ........... 5
5 Example ............................................. 6
6 XML Schema .......................................... 7
7 Security Considerations ............................. 9
8 IANA Considerations ................................. 9
8.1 application/watcherinfo+xml MIME Registration ....... 9
8.2 URN Sub-Namespace Registration for
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:watcherinfo ............................. 10
9 Contributors ........................................ 11
10 Acknowledgements .................................... 12
11 Authors Addresses ................................... 12
12 Normative References ................................ 12
13 Informative References .............................. 13
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 2]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
1 Introduction
Watchers are defined as entities that request (i.e., subscribe to)
information about a resource, using the SIP event framework, RFC 3265
[1]. There is fairly complex state associated with these
subscriptions. This state includes the identity of the subscriber,
the state of the subscription, and so on. The union of the state for
all subscriptions to a particular resource is called the watcher
information for that resource. This state is dynamic, changing as
subscribers come and go. As a result, it is possible, and indeed
useful, to subscribe to the watcher information for a particular
resource. An important application of this is the ability for a user
to find out the set of subscribers to their presentity [11]. This
would allow the user to provide an authorization decision for the
subscription.
To support subscriptions to watcher information, two components are
needed. The first is the definition of a SIP event template-package
for watcher information. The other is the definition of a data format
to represent watcher information. The former is specified in [2], and
the latter is specified here.
2 Terminology
In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
"SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [3] and
indicate requirement levels for compliant implementations.
This document also uses the terms subscriber, watcher, subscription,
notification, watcherinfo subscription, watcherinfo subscriber, and
watcherinfo notification with the meanings described in [2].
3 Structure of Watcher Information
Watcher information is an XML document [4] that MUST be well-formed
and SHOULD be valid. Watcher information documents MUST be based on
XML 1.0 and MUST be encoded using UTF-8. This specification makes use
of XML namespaces for identifying watcherinfo documents and document
fragments. The namespace URI for elements defined by this
specification is a URN [5], using the namespace identifier 'ietf'
defined by [6] and extended by [7]. This URN is:
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:watcherinfo
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 3]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
A watcher information document begins with the root element tag
"watcherinfo". It consists of any number of "watcher-list" sub-
elements, each of which is a list of watchers for a particular
resource. Other elements from different namespaces MAY be present for
the purposes of extensibility; elements or attributes from unknown
namespaces MUST be ignored. There are two attributes associated with
this element, both of which MUST be present:
version: This attribute allows the recipient of watcherinfo
documents to properly order them. Versions start at 0, and
increment by one for each new document sent to a
subscriber. Versions are scoped within a watcherinfo
subscription. Versions MUST be representable using a 32 bit
integer. However, versions do not wrap.
state: This attribute indicates whether the document contains
the full watcherinfo state, or whether it contains only
information on those watchers which have changed since the
previous document (partial).
Each "watcher-list" element contains the set of watchers on a
particular resource. Other elements from different namespaces MAY be
present for the purposes of extensibility; elements or attributes
from unknown namespaces MUST be ignored. There are two attributes
associated with this element, both of which MUST be present:
resource: This attribute contains a URI for the resource being
watched by that list of watchers. It is mandatory.
package: This attribute contains a token indicating the event
package for which watcher information on that resource is
being provided. It is mandatory.
The "watcher" element describes a watcher in the watcher list. The
value of the "watcher" element is a URI for the watcher. This URI
SHOULD be an address-of-record (for example, sip:joe@example.com) as
opposed to a device address (for example, sip:joe@192.0.2.3). There
are three mandatory attributes which MUST be present:
id: A unique identifier for the subscription described by the
watcher element. The id MUST be representable using the
grammar for token as specified by RFC 3261 [8]. It MUST be
unique across all other watchers reported in documents sent
in notifications for a particular watcherinfo subscription.
status: The status of the subscription. The meaning of the
various statuses are defined in the watcher information
event package [2].
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 4]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
event: The event which caused the transition to the current
status. The events are defined in the watcher information
event package [2].
There are also some optional, informative attributes of the watcher
element. These are:
display-name: A textual representation of the name of the
subscriber.
expiration: The amount of time, in seconds from the current
time, that the subscription will expire.
duration-subscribed: The amount of time, expressed in seconds,
between the time the SUBSCRIBE which created the
subscription was received, and the current time.
The xml:lang attribute MAY be used with the "watcher" element to
specify the language of the "display-name".
The number of watchers present for each resource, and the set of
resources listed, depends on the type of data being provided, and to
whom.
For example, consider a presence system using watcher information.
In one scenario, a user, A, subscribes to the presence of another
user, B. A would like to find out about the status of their
subscription. To do so, A subscribes to the watcher information for
B's presence. A does not have authorization to learn the status of
all watchers for B's presence. As a result, the watcher information
sent to A will contain only one watcher - A themself.
In another scenario, a user, B, wishes to learn the set of people who
have subscribed to B's presence. To do this, B subscribes to the
watcher information for B's presence. Here, B is authorized to see
all the watchers of B's presence. As a result, the watcher
information sent to B will contain all watchers of B's presence.
In the case where an administrator wishes to learn the current status
in the system, the watcher information could contain all watchers for
all resources.
4 Computing Watcher Lists from the Document
Typically, the watcherinfo NOTIFY will only contain information about
those watchers whose state has changed. To construct a coherent view
of the total state of all watchers, a watcherinfo subscriber will
need to combine NOTIFYs received over time. The watcherinfo
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 5]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
subscriber maintains a table for each watcher list it receives
information about. Each watcher list is uniquely identified by the
URI in the "resource" attribute of the "watcher-list" element. Each
table contains a row for each watcher in that watcher list. Each row
is indexed by the unique ID for that watcher. It is conveyed in the
"id" attribute of the "watcher" element. The contents of each row
contain the state of that watcher as conveyed in the "watcher"
element. The tables are also associated with a version number. The
version number MUST be initialized with the value of the "version"
attribute from the "watcherinfo" element in the first document
received. Each time a new document is received, the value of the
local version number, and the "version" attribute in the new
document, are compared. If the value in the new document is one
higher than the local version number, the local version number is
increased by one, and the document is processed. If the value in the
document is more than one higher than the local version number, the
local version number is set to the value in the new document, the
document is processed, and the watcherinfo subscriber SHOULD generate
a refresh request to trigger a full state notification. If the value
in the document is less than the local version, the document is
discarded without processing.
The processing of the watcherinfo document depends on whether it
contains full or partial state. If it contains full state, indicated
by the value of the "state" attribute in the "watcherinfo" element,
the contents of all tables associated with this watcherinfo
subscription are flushed. They are repopulated from the document. A
new table is created for each "watcher-list" element, and a new row
in each table is created for each "watcher" element. If the
watcherinfo contains partial state, as indicated by the value of the
"state" attribute in the "watcherinfo" element, the document is used
to update the existing tables. For each "watcher-list" element, the
watcherinfo subscriber checks to see if a table exists for that list.
This check is done by comparing the URI in the "resource" attribute
of the "watcher-list" element with the URI associated with the table.
If a table doesn't exist for that list, one is created. For each
"watcher" element in the list, the watcherinfo subscriber checks to
see whether a row exists for that watcher. This check is done by
comparing the ID in the "id" attribute of the "watcher" element with
the ID associated with the row. If the watcher doesn't exist in the
table, a row is added, and its state is set to the information from
that "watcher" element. If the watcher does exist, its state is
updated to be the information from that "watcher" element. If a row
is updated or created, such that its state is now terminated, that
entry MAY be removed from the table at any time.
5 Example
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 6]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
The following is an example of watcher information for a presentity,
who is a professor. There are two watchers, userA and userB.
sip:userA@example.net
sip:userB@example.org
6 XML Schema
The following is the schema definition of the watcherinfo document
format:
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 7]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 8]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
7 Security Considerations
Watcher information is sensitive information. The protocol used to
distribute it SHOULD ensure privacy, message integrity and
authentication. Furthermore, the protcol should provide access
controls which restrict who can see who elses watcher information.
8 IANA Considerations
This document registers a new MIME type, application/watcherinfo+xml,
and registers a new XML namespace.
8.1 application/watcherinfo+xml MIME Registration
MIME media type name: application
MIME subtype name: watcherinfo+xml
Mandatory parameters: none
Optional parameters: Same as charset parameter application/xml
as specified in RFC 3023 [9].
Encoding considerations: Same as encoding considerations of
application/xml as specified in RFC 3023 [9].
Security considerations: See Section 10 of RFC 3023 [9] and
Section 7 of this specification.
Interoperability considerations: none.
Published specification: This document.
Applications which use this media type: This document type has
been used to support subscriber authorization functions for
SIP-based presence [10] [2].
Additional Information:
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 9]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
Magic Number: None
File Extension: .wif or .xml
Macintosh file type code: "TEXT"
Personal and email address for further information: Jonathan
Rosenberg,
Intended usage: COMMON
Author/Change controller: The IETF.
8.2 URN Sub-Namespace Registration for
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:watcherinfo
This section registers a new XML namespace, as per the guidelines in
[7].
URI: The URI for this namespace is
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:watcherinfo.
Registrant Contact: IETF, SIMPLE working group,
, Jonathan Rosenberg
.
XML:
BEGIN
Watcher Information Namespace
Namespace for Watcher Information
application/watcherinfo+xml
See RFCXXXX.
END
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 10]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
9 Contributors
The following people were part of the original design team that
developed the first version of this specification:
Dean Willis
dynamicsoft
5100 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 1200
Plano, Texas 75024
email: dwillis@dynamicsoft.com
Robert Sparks
dynamicsoft
5100 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 1200
Plano, Texas 75024
email: rsparks@dynamicsoft.com
Ben Campbell
dynamicsoft
5100 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 1200
Plano, Texas 75024
email: bcampbell@dynamicsoft.com
Henning Schulzrinne
Columbia University
M/S 0401
1214 Amsterdam Ave.
New York, NY 10027-7003
email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
Jonathan Lennox
Columbia University
M/S 0401
1214 Amsterdam Ave.
New York, NY 10027-7003
email: lennox@cs.columbia.edu
Christian Huitema
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052-6399
email: huitema@microsoft.com
Bernard Aboba
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052-6399
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 11]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
email: bernarda@microsoft.com
David Gurle
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052-6399
email: dgurle@microsoft.com
Jonathan Lennox contributed the text for the DTD and its usage that
were part of earlier versions of this specification.
10 Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Sean Olson, Steve Donovan, and Cullen
Jennings for their detailed comments and assistance with the XML
schema.
11 Authors Addresses
Jonathan Rosenberg
dynamicsoft
72 Eagle Rock Avenue
East Hanover, NJ 07936
email: jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com
12 Normative References
[1] A. B. Roach, "Session initiation protocol (sip)-specific event
notification," RFC 3265, Internet Engineering Task Force, June 2002.
[2] J. Rosenberg, "A watcher information event template-package for
the session initiation protocol (SIP)," internet draft, Internet
Engineering Task Force, Dec. 2002. Work in progress.
[3] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in rfcs to indicate requirement
levels," RFC 2119, Internet Engineering Task Force, Mar. 1997.
[4] T. Bray, J. Paoli, and C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, "Extensible markup
language (XML) 1.0 (second edition)," W3C Recommendation REC-xml-
20001006, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Oct. 2000. Available at
http://www.w3.org/XML/.
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 12]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
[5] R. Moats, "URN syntax," RFC 2141, Internet Engineering Task
Force, May 1997.
[6] R. Moats, "A URN namespace for IETF documents," RFC 2648,
Internet Engineering Task Force, Aug. 1999.
[7] M. Mealling, "The IETF XML registry," internet draft, Internet
Engineering Task Force, July 2002. Work in progress.
[8] J. Rosenberg, H. Schulzrinne, G. Camarillo, A. R. Johnston, J.
Peterson, R. Sparks, M. Handley, and E. Schooler, "SIP: session
initiation protocol," RFC 3261, Internet Engineering Task Force, June
2002.
[9] M. Murata, S. S. Laurent, and D. Kohn, "XML media types," RFC
3023, Internet Engineering Task Force, Jan. 2001.
[10] J. Rosenberg, "A presence event package for the session
initiation protocol (SIP)," internet draft, Internet Engineering Task
Force, Dec. 2002. Work in progress.
13 Informative References
[11] M. Day, J. Rosenberg, and H. Sugano, "A model for presence and
instant messaging," RFC 2778, Internet Engineering Task Force, Feb.
2000.
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 13]
Internet Draft Watcher Info January 31, 2003
Director.
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (c) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
J. Rosenberg et. al. [Page 14]